Where to look first, department-wide

Command Board

Every component and district rolls caseload, threat, and capacity into one strain score, ranked so the place that most needs attention rises to the top. Aggregate, operational — no case-level detail.

Surge here first

Surge tierUnits whose strain is at least 85% of the board's highest score. These are the heaviest, riskiest, most under-resourced loads right now — the first place to put leadership attention.

Cyber Division14SURGEdriver: high threat weight

2 of 8 units in the surge tier (strain ≥ 85% of board max).

Search unitsTypeTierSort

Showing 8 of 8 units.

#	Unit	Score ? Strain scoreStrain = caseload × threat ÷ capacity, rounded. A swamped, high-threat, under-resourced unit scores higher and rises to the top.	Driver ? Dominant driverThe single factor contributing most to this unit's strain — heavy caseload, high threat weight, or thin capacity — so the fix is obvious.
1	Cyber Divisioncomponent	14SURGE	high threat weight
2	DEA — Southwest Bordercomponent	12SURGE	heavy caseload
3	FBI — Counterterrorismcomponent	11	high threat weight
4	BOP — Operationscomponent	10	heavy caseload
5	S.D. Tex. (USAO)district	10	heavy caseload
6	S.D.N.Y. (USAO)district	8	heavy caseload
7	ATF — Field Operationscomponent	6	high threat weight
8	U.S. Marshals Servicecomponent	4	heavy caseload

Strain = (caseload × threat) ÷ capacity. Weights shown openly. This is an operational signal about workload, not a verdict on people.

Ask AI

AI can be wrong. Not medical, legal, or financial advice.

strain.formula

$ strain = round(caseload × threat ÷ capacity)
tiers: surge ≥ 85% · watch ≥ 60% · steady < 60% (of board max)
board max = 14 · units = 8 · source = sample (no live integration)

Strain board

Ask AI